Project Management Consultant (PMC) Role - Myths and Truths

The Project Management Consultants (PMC) roles are applied in managing medium to large project for oil and gas companies all around geographical region countries. Typically, it comprises of a multidisciplinary team of experienced engineers and managers, whose primary task, is to supply an independent oversight and progress monitoring and reporting, for necessary engineering and management specialties, for a given medium to major project, to the Oil & public-service corporation, hiring the PMC services. Here are some myths and truths about the PMC role of note. once I use the word Contractor within the context below, it should see a stage of engineering from Concept to FEED to EPC (or PC) because the contract is also.

Myth-1: PMC must thoroughly check all Contractor documents and any omission or error by Contractor is that the responsibility of PMC.
Truth: PMC is given charge and responsibility ONLY of Review of Contractor documentation and NOT CHECKING for omissions, errors etc. Be very clear about this! Checking Contractor documents for technical accuracy is a component of Contractor responsibility and not PMC. Technical accuracy and abiding by Contractual documentation, codes and standards, adhering to Contractual requirements etc are all the entire responsibility of the Contractor and not PMC. The key difference is in understanding what review is, as opposition checking. Checking means searching for accuracy, integrity, technical compliance to project requirements, other discipline documents, contract, codes and standards etc. for any given project specification/datasheet/drawing etc. Reviewing is giving a re-evaluation, which includes a broader function of trying to find context, contractual oversight, content, implications to further engineering stages, procurement, construction, practical lessons learnt from previous applications, site issues etc. mutually can see, the 2 are very different functions and have their own scope and responsibility.

Myth-2: Approval of any documentation of Contractor by PMC, now absolves the Contractor of fulfilling Contractual scope, and restrict only to approved documentation.
Truth: Approval of documentation by PMC is just an engineering/management achieve the project. Fulfilling Contractual obligations, procedures, technical documentation is all still within Contractor’s legal binding. Any omission by Contractor from base contractual scope and any approved variation orders, remains the responsibility of Contractor, without prejudice to PMC Approval of the identical. the ultimate authority and responsibility of fulfilling Contractual requirements always lies with the Contractor, since they're legally bound by Contract and PMC services are merely administering and supervising Contractor works.

Myth-3: The PMC must check for correctness at technical, managerial levels, all Contractual documentation of the Contractor. Truth: The PMC role is to administer, monitor, supervise and participate within the Contractor functions in the least levels- engineering, technical, secretarial, documentation, planning, management, procurement, construction and other functions PRN by Contract. PMC is appointed by company, primarily as a guardian of the Contract; in order that progress of project within Contractual obligation is steadied all the time, and not subject to fluctuations of demands by additions, wish-lists of company Engineering/Operations involvement, during project execution by Contractor. to guard the Contract is one amongst the prime functions of the PMC, beyond all other aspects. Correctness falls within checking. PMC does reviewing and oversight.
Refer Myth-1 for those differences. The PMC is a bridge between Oil Companies interests and Contractors obligations within Contractual Execution, to deliver the project on time, and multidisciplinary integrity and compliance to all or any codes, standards and procedures required per Contract.

Myth-4: The PMC must protect Company interests against variations issued by Contractor during project execution.
Truth: Contract administration and control, within budget of Contract, additionally as timely execution is certainly one in all the key responsibility of the PMC. However, if some equipment is required to satisfy contractual scope, but has been disregarded within Contract, it's PMC responsibility to hold out administration, control and approval of variation orders, through parent company, to the Contractor. To suggest, that one must defend and check out to acquire the maximum amount as possible within the Contractual scope, not only is simply connotative professional misdemeanor and misconduct, but is unethical also. Contractual obligation is that the key for both parties here- the company and also the Contractor- Something not within the Contract- does become a variation. On the Contrary, something taken out of Contract, also becomes something to subtract from related sums given in Contract. PMC must be in integrity and firm during this regard, since they're the guardians of the Contract.

So, find the correct option Don't get confused. If the decision is difficult then you can connect with us at N.M Consultation and Engineers Pvt Ltd.